Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Due to the advanced technology, we are now able to shop anything from home. Popularity of online shopping has significantly increased. Some people in our society say that due to online shopping, stores in towns and cities will not exist in the future. From my perspective, physical stores will remain important in the future because it allows individuals to explore varities of products at the store and companies need place to advertise their products. This essay will outline both perspectives in detail.

To begin, there are few reasons why some people assume that physical stores will be disappered in the future. The first and foremost reason is that they analyse only positive sides of online shopping. It is indeed true that it is possible to operate online business from remote places which reduces the operating cost. For instance, shopekeeper on the busy streets are responsible to pay huge rent, whereas online seller may escape from this cost and save some money. They often reduce the price to compete the store. So many people in our society feel that physical store would not survive in the future.

However, emerging companies need places to marketing their products. It has been observed that new companies could not compete well-known brand that are selling their products online. As a result, physical stores can offer them better opportunities to advertise their products. Furthermore, many people in our society would love to go for shopping in their free time. They usually compare the prices of the products with different companies. This allows them to buy product with competitve price. For instance, emerging companies may offer peanut butter in lower price than reputed brand in order to increase their selling.

To conclude, online shopping is increasing over time, although physical store will remain popular among the consumers. Many people in our society buy products online when they see discounts and better offers, but they still do not fully trust on online sellers. This convinced me that physical stores will not going to be replaced in the future.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you disagree that online shopping will eliminate physical shops, and the conclusion reinforces this view. You also acknowledge why others predict closures, explaining that online sellers avoid high street rent and can offer lower prices. This addresses both the claim and your own opinion. However, the support for your position is uneven. The point that shops help emerging companies advertise is relevant but needs a clearer explanation of how this would prevent closures. The shopping-in-person example is also somewhat narrow, focusing on comparing prices and peanut butter rather than developing broader reasons such as seeing or trying products. Extend these ideas with specific, convincing examples and explain their significance more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph presenting the case for online shopping, a contrasting paragraph supporting physical stores, and a conclusion. Transitions such as “To begin,” “However,” and “To conclude” make the direction of the argument easy to follow. Some connections between ideas are less clear or feel mechanical. For example, the claim that new companies need physical places to market products moves quickly to the assertion that stores offer better advertising opportunities, without explaining the link. “This allows them” also has an unclear reference: it could refer to consumers comparing prices or to companies. Use more precise referencing and build each paragraph through explicit cause-and-effect links rather than relying mainly on signposting phrases.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “operating cost,” “remote places,” “reputed brand,” and “discounts and better offers,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. There are also attempts at less common or formal expressions, but several word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems reduce precision. Examples include “shop anything,” “places to marketing,” “competitive price,” and misspellings such as “varities” and “disappered.” Some phrases are also repetitive, particularly “in our society” and “products.” Aim to use more natural combinations and check spelling carefully. More precise terms for the benefits of physical retail, such as trying products in person or receiving immediate assistance, would also help you express your argument with greater flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple and complex sentence forms, including a contrast clause in “online shopping is increasing over time, although physical store will remain popular” and a relative clause in “companies that are selling their products online.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “physical stores … it allows” has a subject–pronoun agreement problem, while “physical store will not going to be replaced” uses an incorrect verb construction. Articles and plurals also need attention in phrases such as “buy product” and “physical store.” Continue practising accurate agreement, verb patterns, and article use, while retaining your attempts at complex sentences. Proofreading each sentence for its subject and main verb would help improve control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.