Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-11-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In the modern era, the demand of online shopping will increase ,which leads to shut down the local stores in cities and towns. I strongly disagree with this view because it raises the unemployment rate and quality issues which will be discussed in the upcoming paragraphs.

First and foremost, digital shopping will lower down the employment. If stores are closed in cities, it's hard for privileged people to earn, because these shops are not only sources of income. Another reason is illiteracy, some of them are not tech-savvy they do not know how to use these digital apps to order mostly among elderly people. For instance, according to a recent survey, they recognise that the unemployment rate has risen by more than half in India, especially in small towns, and some of the stores are bankrupt.

Furthermore, people have quality issues and urgency, which will be solved by physical shops. When individuals shop online, they do not know whether the product has similar quality they want or its a scam. Moreover, things like medicines or groceries are an immediate need, which will not encourage internet shopping. To illustrate, a significant number of individuals have been targeted by online scams because online shoppers show something else and end up with low-quality products.

In conclusion, although online shopping is heading for growth, this growth has a worse impact on the shops in cities or towns. In my opinion, this will raise unemployment as well as issues with quality checks because sometimes they do not receive the same products as it looks in the picture.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the opening: you strongly disagree that online shopping will cause all town and city shops to close. You give two relevant reasons—employment and the ability to inspect products or obtain urgent goods—and support them with examples involving older people, medicines, groceries, and online scams. However, the discussion does not fully establish why shops will continue to exist: the employment point mainly describes the harm of closures, rather than explaining why online shopping will not replace physical shops. The survey claim about unemployment and bankrupt stores is also difficult to interpret and is not clearly connected to your argument. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation of how it supports your position, and make the examples more precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion that restates your view. Signposting such as “First and foremost,” “Furthermore,” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the progression, and the examples are generally placed near the points they illustrate. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some of the flexibility associated with stronger cohesion. However, some links are mechanical, and the relationship between claims is occasionally unclear—for example, the survey sentence moves from unemployment to stores being bankrupt without explaining the connection. The conclusion also repeats the main points rather than drawing them together. Use more precise referencing and transitions that show cause, contrast, or consequence.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main ideas, including “unemployment rate,” “tech-savvy,” “quality issues,” “urgent need,” and “online scams.” There are also attempts at more specific expressions, such as “sources of income” and “targeted by online scams.” However, several noticeable word-choice and collocation problems make parts of the argument less natural or precise: “demand of online shopping,” “lower down the employment,” and “people have quality issues and urgency” do not express the intended meanings clearly. “Privileged people” also seems unsuitable for the workers you mean. Build a bank of natural phrases for employment, consumer choice, and product reliability, and check that each expression fits its context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “If stores are closed in cities” and a relative clause in “which will be solved by physical shops.” Most sentences remain understandable, and the overall meaning is not usually blocked. Some grammatical errors nevertheless recur. For example, “some of them are not tech-savvy they do not know” joins two independent clauses without suitable punctuation or a conjunction; “its a scam” needs the possessive form “it’s”; and “as it looks in the picture” has an unclear grammatical relationship to “products.” There are also punctuation and spacing slips around commas. Practise separating clauses correctly and proofreading apostrophes, sentence boundaries, and clause structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.