Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-07-28
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
You have just read an article in an international travel magazine which contained some information about your town that is incorrect.
Write a letter to the editor of the magazine. In your letter
- correct the information in the article
- explain why it is important for the magazine to give correct information
- suggest what the magazine should do about this situation
You do NOT need to write any addresses.
Begin your letter as follows:
Dear Sir or Madam,
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing this letter to you beacause you have published a magazine which include information about my town. firstly, I want to inform you that you have mentioned incorret information about my town. Its unethical to publish such incorrect information that leads to misconception in other's mind.
If you want to describe my town you should have enough information about it. without knowing false/incorrect information lead to misconception. If someone want to visit but according to your magazine mind could be destructed
I suggest you that if you have not enough knowledge about anything don't publish because not anyone visit to confirm about town. Someone just have believe on reading as well. No one could justify it.
Please make the correction and don't lead this type of error in future.
Wishing you best of luck.
I hope you don't do this in future not for my town as well as others town.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response addresses all three bullet points of the task: correcting the information, explaining the importance of accuracy, and suggesting a solution. However, the development of these points is somewhat limited and repetitive. The tone is occasionally aggressive rather than professional, which is important for a formal letter to an editor. While the task requirements are met, the ideas could be expanded with more specific detail regarding the nature of the error and the desired outcome to achieve a higher band.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The letter is organised into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the flow between sentences is often disjointed. There is a lack of varied cohesive devices; the writing relies on simple transitions like 'firstly' and 'if'. Some sentences, such as 'without knowing false/incorrect information lead to misconception', are grammatically fragmented and lack clear logical connection to the previous thought. Improving the use of linking words and ensuring each paragraph has a clear, unified focus would enhance the overall coherence.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is somewhat limited and repetitive. Words like 'incorrect' and 'misconception' are used multiple times, and there are errors in word choice, such as 'mind could be destructed' (likely meaning 'distorted' or 'misled') and 'don't lead this type of error'. The range of vocabulary is sufficient to convey the basic message, but it lacks the precision and variety expected for higher bands. To improve, focus on using more natural collocations and a wider range of synonyms to avoid repetition.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including issues with subject-verb agreement ('you have published a magazine which include'), article usage, and sentence structure. Many sentences are awkward or incomplete, such as 'not anyone visit to confirm about town'. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic structures impacts the readability of the letter. To improve, focus on mastering basic sentence construction, including correct verb tenses and the appropriate use of articles and prepositions.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.