Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-08-27
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
You have just read an article in an international travel magazine which contained some information about your town that is incorrect.
Write a letter to the editor of the magazine. In your letter
- correct the information in the article
- explain why it is important for the magazine to give correct information
- suggest what the magazine should do about this situation
You do NOT need to write any addresses.
Begin your letter as follows:
Dear Sir or Madam,
Student answer (Band 7.0)
Dear Sir,
I am writing in response to an article recently publlished in your international travel magazine about my hometown. Although I appreciate your interest in our town, I noticed that some of the infomation presented was inaccurate and some of missed information.
First, article mentioned that there are vey few recreational facilities and that town is difficult to access. This is incorrect. In fact, our town has plenty of the facilities such as, well-maintained parks, modern shopping centre, restaurants and entertainment facilities. Moreover, public transport has renovationed in recent years, which making it convenient for both residents and tourists to travel around the area. The article also mentioned that the town has a polluted environment, whereas it is actually known for its clean surroundings and beautiful natural scenery.
It is extremely important for a respected international magazine such as yours to provide accurate information because many readers may rely on your articles when deciding where to spend their holidays.
I would suggest that you publish a correction in you next edition and update the online version of the article immediately. In addition, your editiorial team should verify information through reliable local sources or local authorities before publishing future travel articles.
I hope you will take this matter seriously and correct the mistakes as soon as possible.
Yours faithfully,
Hani Prajapati
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 8.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 8.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 7.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 8.0
The response successfully addresses all three bullet points of the task. You clearly identify the incorrect information regarding the town's facilities and environment, explain the importance of accuracy for potential tourists, and provide actionable suggestions for the magazine. The tone is appropriate for a formal letter to an editor. The ideas are well-developed and the purpose of the letter is clear from the outset. To reach a higher band, ensure that all minor factual corrections are presented with even greater precision, but overall, the task requirements are fully met.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 8.0
The letter is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs addressing each prompt requirement, and a formal closing. Paragraphing is used effectively to separate the correction of facts from the explanation and suggestions. Cohesive devices such as 'First', 'Moreover', and 'In addition' are used to guide the reader through the argument. The progression of ideas is smooth and easy to follow. The referencing is generally clear, and the structure supports the overall purpose of the letter well.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.5
You demonstrate a sufficient range of vocabulary to convey your message clearly. Phrases like 'well-maintained parks', 'reliable local sources', and 'take this matter seriously' are used effectively. There are some minor spelling errors, such as 'publlished', 'infomation', and 'editiorial', which are likely slips rather than a lack of vocabulary knowledge. While the range is adequate for the task, incorporating a few more sophisticated collocations or less common lexical items would help elevate the score further.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the meaning is always clear, there are several grammatical inaccuracies, such as 'some of missed information' (should be 'some missing information'), 'public transport has renovationed' (should be 'has been renovated'), and 'which making it' (should be 'which makes it'). These errors do not impede communication, but they indicate a need for more careful proofreading of verb tenses and relative clauses. Increasing the frequency of error-free complex sentences will improve your score.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.