Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

You have just read an article in an international travel magazine which contained some information about your town that is incorrect.

Write a letter to the editor of the magazine. In your letter

• correct the information in the article
• explain why it is important for the magazine to give correct information
• suggest what the magazine should do about this situation

You do NOT need to write any addresses.

Begin your letter as follows:

Dear Sir or Madam,

Student answer (Band 7.0)

Dear Sir or Madam,

I am writing to bring it to your kind attention that I have recently read an article in your magazine which contained some incorrect information about Lahore, which has been my hometown for the past ten years.

Let me explain it to you. It has been mentioned in your article that the famous Taj Mahal is located in Lahore, where tourists from all over the world come to witness its beautiful architecture. However, this ancient mughal heritage is located in Agra, which is a city in India. It is not located in Lahore, Pakistan.

I believe that it is important for an international magazine, like yours, to give correct information to its readers. Otherwise, the credibility of your magazine will become questionable. Moreover, if people give reference of any false information from your article, this will negatively impact the reputation of your magazine in the global community.

I would want to suggest that the editor-chief of your magazine should hold the responsibility to verify the information cited in the articles from authentic sources, prior to the publication. Moreover, the assistant editors should prooofread the article atleast twice to make sure that there are not any grammatical mistakes

Thank you for your consideration.

Yours faithfully,

Sara

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

The letter addresses all three requirements: it corrects the location of the Taj Mahal, explains that inaccurate reporting could damage the magazine’s credibility, and recommends verification and proofreading procedures. The correction is clear and supported with the relevant contrast between Agra in India and Lahore in Pakistan. Your explanation of why accuracy matters is also relevant, although the point about the magazine’s reputation is somewhat general and could be developed with a specific consequence for readers or local tourism. The proposed actions are practical, but proofreading for grammatical mistakes does not directly address the factual error; prioritising fact-checking and issuing a correction would make the response more complete. The formal opening and closing suit the purpose.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The information follows a clear, logical sequence: you introduce the problem, identify the error, explain why accuracy matters, and then suggest action. Paragraphing helps distinguish these stages, and linking expressions such as “However,” “Moreover,” and “Otherwise” make the relationships between ideas easy to follow. The progression is clear throughout, though some transitions are formulaic, particularly “Let me explain it to you,” which is less natural in a formal letter. The final paragraph also combines two recommendations without a clear distinction between correcting this specific article and improving future editorial checks. Separating those actions and using a more direct transition would make the cohesion more polished.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use a suitable range of formal vocabulary, including “credibility,” “authentic sources,” “verify,” and “reputation,” and the meaning remains clear throughout. There is some awareness of register, although a few choices and collocations are not fully natural: “bring it to your kind attention” is overly elaborate, “give reference of” is awkward, and “editor-chief” is not the usual title. Spelling errors in “prooofread” and “atleast” also reduce accuracy. These issues do not prevent understanding, but they limit the precision and naturalness expected at a stronger level. Aim for concise, conventional expressions such as “draw your attention to,” “refer to,” and “editor-in-chief,” and check spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 7.0

The letter shows a useful range of sentence forms, including a relative clause in “which has been my hometown” and conditional structures such as “Otherwise, the credibility … will become questionable.” Many sentences are controlled and easy to understand, and punctuation generally supports the meaning. A few grammatical choices remain awkward: “I would want to suggest” is less natural than “I would like to suggest,” while “there are not any grammatical mistakes” would be more idiomatically expressed as “there are no grammatical mistakes.” The long final sentence also needs a full stop at the end. Overall, the complex structures are handled well, but refining these constructions and punctuation would improve consistency.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.