Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-08-12

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

some people argued that having friend with same mindset is way better, although, some are believe that it is good to have buddies who gives you clear picture. while having like-minded friends gives comfort and supportive relationship. i believe having friend with distinct perspective boost career goal in long run.

on the one hand, friendship plays vital role person's life. it is very significant to have bosom friend with same thinking and opinions. it ultimately fruitful for comfort zone and clear communication. it has less chances of conflicts and reduce the stress level. in addition, it provide quick choices that person can adapt and take decision swiftly. same thinking boost team-work and build trust. for instance, having same interest in styling and food choice.

on the other hand, different perspective have huge impact on people.as it gives new ideas and better thinking and aide in smart choices. it would be beneficial for personal growth. it will boost confidence and help us to think out of the box. it has some other advantages like it prevent us from overconfidence which leads to disturb our goal. for example, if friend is having grave issue regarding the addiction of alcohol a friend can suggest to stop and encourage to acquire healthy lifestyle.

to recapitulate, have different perspective buddies helps person to thrive is more significant than the having same mindset people. it would be benefial in safe place but it would be forshort time. it is good to have disgreement between friends for personal growth and bread thinking.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both views and provides a clear personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited. While you mention that like-minded friends provide comfort and that differing perspectives aid personal growth, the supporting examples—such as 'styling and food choice' or 'alcohol addiction'—are brief and lack depth. To achieve a higher band, you should expand on your reasoning by explaining the 'why' and 'how' more thoroughly. The position is consistent throughout, but the overall development remains at a basic level, preventing a higher score.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organised into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. You use some cohesive devices like 'on the one hand', 'on the other hand', and 'to recapitulate'. However, the use of these devices is sometimes mechanical, and there are issues with sentence-level cohesion, such as the fragmented opening sentence. Additionally, some transitions between sentences are abrupt, and the lack of varied linking words makes the flow feel repetitive. Improving the variety of your cohesive devices and ensuring smoother transitions between ideas will significantly enhance the coherence of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the range and precision required for higher bands. You rely on simple, repetitive phrasing such as 'same thinking', 'good', and 'boost'. There are also several word-choice errors and awkward collocations, such as 'bread thinking' (likely meaning 'broad thinking') and 'forshort time'. While your meaning is generally clear, the lack of sophisticated or less common vocabulary limits your score. You should focus on learning collocations and using more precise academic synonyms to express your ideas more effectively.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede the flow. Common issues include missing articles ('a person's life'), subject-verb agreement errors ('some are believe', 'it provide'), and punctuation mistakes. The sentence structure is often repetitive, and the lack of proper capitalization and consistent verb tense usage detracts from the overall quality. To improve, focus on mastering basic sentence construction, ensuring subject-verb agreement, and proofreading for minor errors that occur due to haste.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.