Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-08-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In this materialistic world, friends are considered as the valuable asset in an individual's life. Concerning with this, some proponents of the society reckon that comrades who already possess same perspectives as them are the best one to choose as a friend, while few community people deem that it is better to go with the friend who often disagree with one's opinion. This essay will discuss the effectiveness of both perspective followed by my firm view which is mentioned in the subsequent paragraphs.

On the one hand, there are multifaceted rationales why choosing a friend who already has the same opinions can prove beneficial. To explicate, having a companion whose viewpoint are on the same page like the other can lend a helping hand. To exemplify, if someone has the same opinions on finance likewise his friends which can broadens their horizons as well as by time they can set up their own firms and can generate magnificent monetary benefits.

On the other hand I and some conservationist contemplate that having friends who sometimes disagree with one can make one view distinct opinion from different eye and also it can boost the motivation. To explain it in simple words, according to the human tendency one can boost their confidence if their friend disagree on some of his view. To cite an example, I and my friend once had a seldom opinion on exercise where my view was not to go gym howbeit my friend disagree with it and he share some upsides of it which not only make me see a different viewpoint but so it has push my strength to the next level where from that day I maintained my health by daily hitting gym. Henceforth, this example can prove why friend who disagree with you can become beneficial.

To conclude, though sharing similar thoughts can lend a helping hand to tackle the problem easily, I prudently emphasizes that having a friend who disagree with one's thought not only push an individual's motivation but also it can acts advisable.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses all parts of the task, discussing both perspectives and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant, though the development is somewhat uneven. For example, the argument regarding friends with similar opinions is a bit vague, focusing on 'generating monetary benefits' without fully exploring the social or emotional aspects of friendship. The second body paragraph is better supported with a personal example, though it remains slightly repetitive. To reach a higher band, ensure that each point is fully explored with more depth and nuance, rather than relying on general statements.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the two viewpoints. Cohesive devices are present, such as 'On the one hand', 'To exemplify', and 'To conclude', which help guide the reader. However, some transitions feel slightly mechanical or forced, and there are instances where the flow is interrupted by awkward phrasing, such as 'Concerning with this'. Improving the variety and naturalness of linking words would enhance the overall coherence of the essay.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The range of vocabulary is adequate for the task, with some attempts at less common items like 'multifaceted rationales', 'magnificent monetary benefits', and 'prudently'. However, there are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'comrades who already possess same perspectives' (should be 'share the same perspectives') and 'conservationist' (used incorrectly to mean 'those who hold a different view'). These errors occasionally impede the precision of the argument, though they do not prevent the reader from understanding the intended meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. While the writer attempts complex sentences, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with subject-verb agreement and article usage, such as 'friends are considered as the valuable asset' (should be 'a valuable asset') and 'friend who disagree' (should be 'friends who disagree'). Punctuation is generally functional, but there are minor errors that affect the polish of the writing. To improve, the writer should focus on proofreading for basic grammatical accuracy and ensuring consistent verb forms.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.