Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-09-30
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 4.0)
There are no denying fact that the phenomenon of choose friends have same opinion and other friends have disagree opinion is ubiquitous accross the globe due to its importance. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the potential impact in recent years. this essay will further elaborate my views and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
Initiating with the points supporting first school of thought, firstly, some people believe that choosing friends have same opinion but someother people asume that different opinion. Another striking point in this regards is that choose different opinion friends because of vary in knowledge and decision power making. To cite an example, different person have different perception discussing, it cannot be ignored that tha main reason behind this is that disagree have many option to choose.
On its otherside, people who held another viewpoint say that same opinion have same perception which was not useful. Moving further, it is pertinent to mention that choose friends based on their knowledge and behaviour. Moreover, the propenents of this perspective highlights several benefits like choosing same opinion friends have same thinking ability among them. This often lead to same opinion friends have same and different opinion friends have sometimes disagree with them.
T conclude, one can reach to a gist that, solving a global issue is not easy but with the joint efforts of the people, a control can be taken over choosing friends have same and different opinion. I believe that aforementioned points are strongly supporting my viewpoint.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.0 |
| Overall | 4.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0
The response attempts to address both views regarding friends with similar versus differing opinions, but the development of ideas is severely hindered by repetitive phrasing and unclear articulation. Phrases such as 'choosing friends have same opinion' are repeated throughout without adding substantial depth or concrete examples. Although a personal viewpoint is stated towards the end, the arguments remain largely underdeveloped and tangential, failing to fully explore the nuances of the prompt. Consequently, the response aligns best with Band 4 descriptors, where the task is addressed only minimally and ideas lack proper expansion.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0
The essay displays significant structural weaknesses that disrupt the overall flow. While basic paragraphing is attempted, the logical progression is frequently broken by repetitive sentences and disconnected thoughts. Cohesive devices are either misused or absent, making transitions between paragraphs abrupt and confusing. For instance, transitional phrases like 'Initiating with the points' and 'On its otherside' are awkward and fail to connect ideas smoothly. Referencing is also unclear, particularly with pronouns and dangling phrases. This level of organisation corresponds to a Band 4 score, as information and ideas are not arranged in a coherent manner.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.0
The vocabulary used is very basic and repetitive, frequently relying on inaccurate forms of words, such as 'choose friends' instead of 'choosing friends' or 'same opinion' instead of 'shared opinions'. There are noticeable errors in word formation and collocation throughout the text, including 'accross', 'asume', and 'propenents'. The range of vocabulary is severely limited, which strains the reader's comprehension and prevents the writer from conveying precise meanings. This falls squarely into the Band 4 descriptor, characterised by basic, repetitive vocabulary and errors that strain the reader.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0
The grammatical structures used throughout the response are extremely limited and frequently faulty. The text contains numerous basic errors in tense, agreement, and sentence construction, such as 'There are no denying fact' and 'this often lead to same opinion'. Complex sentence forms are either absent or attempted with severe errors that distort the intended meaning. Punctuation and control over simple sentence patterns are weak, with frequent grammatical breakdowns. These persistent, major errors throughout almost every sentence place the response at a Band 4 level.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.