Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-11
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Some people argue that it is better to friendship with who always agree with them, but some people believe it is great to have friends who sometimes does not agree with their opinion.
On the one hand, when people choose friends who always have the same opinions as them ,because it helps them to strenthen the bond and better understanding. If someone has a trick for any exam, he also wants to tell this trick to his friend and his friend understands it and use in the exam. As a result, they both agree with this idea. It is helping them to strenghtening their bond. Besides that, if someone is a scientist, he also wants a friendship with whom want to become a scientist. Therefore, they can share with each othertheir ideas, knowledge.
On the other hand, it is good to have friends who sometime disagree with them, it results in better ideas and encouragement to each other. Some people have great ideas but it is not possible that everytime if you have any idea, and other person should agree with it. For instance, there are two friends in a university. They need to work on project and they both have different approach to execute this presentation. Altough, they argue with each other but in the end, they end up in a good idea.
In my opinion, I think it is great to have friendship with those who sometimes does nit agree with your statement because it helps in great ideas. We can learn about our mistakes and also improve our knowledge.
In conclusion, friends are great method of sharing knowledge, ideas and help in strengthening our bonds.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You discuss both views and give a clear preference for friends who sometimes disagree, supported by relevant examples about sharing exam strategies and collaborating on a university project. This covers the main parts of the task. However, the first view is explained mainly through shared interests and knowledge, rather than showing in detail why agreement itself makes a friendship better. The project example supports disagreement, but the outcome is only briefly stated as “a good idea,” without explaining how differing approaches improved it. Your conclusion restates the general value of friendship but could reinforce your specific position. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation of its effects and make the comparison between the two views more explicit.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, your opinion, and a conclusion. “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In my opinion” help readers follow the discussion. Some links, however, are mechanical or unclear. For example, “As a result, they both agree with this idea” does not clearly follow from the exam-trick example, and “Altough, they argue with each other” interrupts the sentence rather than linking the contrast smoothly. The conclusion also repeats broad points from earlier paragraphs instead of bringing the argument together. Use clearer cause-and-effect links and refer explicitly to how each example supports the relevant view; this would make progression more natural.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “opinions,” “bond,” “share,” “approach,” and “knowledge.” There are also attempts at more specific language, such as “execute this presentation,” though the phrasing is not natural for the intended meaning. Noticeable word-choice, collocation, word-form, and spelling errors limit precision: “better to friendship,” “great method,” “strenthen,” and “does nit” make parts of the response less fluent or clear. Some expressions are also repetitive, particularly “great ideas” and “agree.” Build a more reliable range of collocations for discussing friendship, disagreement, and collaboration, and proofread spelling and word forms so your meaning is consistently easy to understand.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and complex sentences, including conditional and subordinate structures, as in “If someone has a trick for any exam…” and “because it helps them…”. However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors in agreement, verb forms, sentence construction, and punctuation can make the reader pause. For example, “friends who sometimes does not agree” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “when people choose friends… ,because it helps” is an incomplete or incorrectly joined construction. The sentence beginning “Some people have great ideas but it is not possible…” is also difficult to follow because its clauses are not controlled clearly. Practise building accurate sentences with one main clause and a clearly connected supporting clause, then check agreement and punctuation.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.