Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 14 · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, some people believe that it is good to choose friend who always have similarity in their opinions. While others think that a good friend is one who sometimes oppose your decisions. I believe that, a real friend is one who guide you in your wrong opinion and sometimes prefer to oppose your decision when you are wrong. This essay will discuss both view in the following paragraphs with a suitable conclusion.

On one hand, some individuals thinks that always choose a friend who support you in every opinion because it build strong relationship with your friend and trust as well. Moreover, a greater number of proportion are usually hide negative things such as involvement in crime or in any bad activity. Additionally, younger children are prefer to make a lie in front of police to protect their mate like robbery. For example, in some countries, teenagers often encourages their immoral act like sexual relation with someone without marriage. Although it make stronger relationship between them but also leads to negative development in personality by having friends who are always ready to support your every decision whether it is false.

On the other hand, some humans think that having a friend who have a courage to deny your wrong actions is a real friend because it safes your friend from bad happening and build trustworthy relationship between them. In addition to this, everyone prefer to consider this characteristics in making buddy because sometimes person does not able to recognize their opinions and trap in difficult situation unintentionally. For example, in some rural areas mostly population usually stop their friends from doing illegal act like murder or theft in rage by educating them that you are wrong. Therefore, it results in the trust, confidence and good companionship.

In conclusion, it is good thing to support your friend but it depends on the nature of decision that this decision is beneficial or harmful for your friend. So, it is necessary in choosing your friend who are able to stop you in your wrong decision.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You address both views and give a clear personal position: you favour friends who challenge harmful or mistaken decisions, while acknowledging that support can strengthen trust. The examples about protecting a friend from crime and discouraging illegal acts are relevant to the contrast. This meets the task well, but the discussion is uneven: the first view is mainly presented as loyalty that can enable wrongdoing, so the benefits of choosing like-minded friends are not fully explored. Some claims, such as teenagers encouraging immoral behaviour, are broad and would be stronger with a more specific explanation. To develop the response further, explain when agreement is valuable as well as why honest disagreement can help, and connect each example more directly to the argument.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion that restates your preference. Signposting such as “On one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” makes the progression easy to follow. The contrast between supportive friends and friends who challenge harmful choices is also maintained throughout. However, some links are mechanical, and references are occasionally unclear—for example, “this decision” and “this characteristics” do not point smoothly to a specific idea. The first body paragraph also moves quickly from trust to crime and then to teenagers, which weakens the progression. Use fewer formulaic transitions and organise each paragraph around one main reason, followed by explanation and a clearly connected example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “trustworthy relationship,” “illegal act,” “difficult situation,” and “good companionship,” and the reader can generally understand your meaning. There are also attempts at less common expressions, such as “immoral act” and “unintentionally.” However, inaccurate word choice and collocation are noticeable and sometimes make ideas awkward: “a greater number of proportion are usually hide negative things” and “it safes your friend from bad happening” are difficult to interpret naturally. Several phrases repeat “friend,” “decision,” and “wrong,” limiting flexibility. Focus on learning common word partnerships and choosing precise expressions—for example, “conceal wrongdoing” or “prevent a friend from getting into trouble”—rather than translating phrases directly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “because,” “although,” and “whether,” and the overall message remains understandable. However, control is inconsistent, with frequent errors in agreement, articles, verb forms, and sentence construction. Examples include “some individuals thinks,” “it build strong relationship,” and “everyone prefer”; these subjects require matching verb forms. There are also faulty constructions such as “younger children are prefer” and “sometimes person does not able to recognize,” which make the reader work to understand the intended meaning. Punctuation is also uneven, including the unnecessary comma after “I believe that.” Practise accurate basic sentence patterns first, then build complex sentences around them and check subject–verb agreement and articles.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.